实用老年医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 147-153.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2026.02.009

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

老年慢性病多重用药病人衰弱发展轨迹与认知功能的相关性分析

韩霜, 贺刚   

  1. 563000 贵州省遵义市,遵义市第一人民医院(遵义医科大学第三附属医院)综合医疗中心(老年医学二病区)
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-18 出版日期:2026-02-20 发布日期:2026-02-27
  • 通讯作者: 贺刚,Email:1480243885@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    遵义市科技计划项目[遵市科合HZ字(2024)86号]

Correlation between frailty development trajectories and cognitive function in elderly patients with chronic diseases and polypharmacy

HAN Shuang, HE Gang   

  1. Comprehensive Medical Center (Geriatric Medicine Ward 2), Zunyi First People’s Hospital (Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University), Zunyi 563000, China
  • Received:2025-08-18 Online:2026-02-20 Published:2026-02-27
  • Contact: HE Gang, Email: 1480243885@qq.com

摘要: 目的 探究老年慢性病多重用药病人的衰弱症状和认知功能的变化情况,分析两者的关联性。 方法 收集2023年8月至2024年2月在遵义市第一人民医院就诊的110例老年慢性病多重用药病人的临床资料。在就诊当天(T1)、就诊后6个月(T2)、就诊后12个月(T3),采用Fried衰弱表型量表(FFP)和MMSE对病人进行衰弱症状和认知功能评估。使用Pearson相关系数分析各时间点衰弱症状的相关性。使用Mplus 8.3软件构建潜变量增长曲线模型(LGCM)探索衰弱症状的发展轨迹。根据轨迹特征将110例病人分为稳定衰弱组(n=58)、缓慢衰弱组(n=32)和快速衰弱组(n=20)。比较不同轨迹类别病人的一般资料,并采用重复测量方差分析探讨不同轨迹组各时间点的认知功能评分变化。采用多重线性回归分析衰弱发展轨迹与认知功能的相关性。 结果 入组病人3个时间点的FFP得分相关性均有统计学意义(P<0.001),且T3时的FFP得分高于T2和T1(P<0.05);病人FFP得分的初始水平均值为1.543,且个体间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),衰弱症状从T1—T3整体呈现上升的趋势,且个体间的变化速度差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。3组不同衰弱轨迹病人的年龄、BMI、用药种类及患病种类差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);重复测量方差分析显示,T1—T3时期稳定衰弱组病人MMSE得分变化差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但缓慢衰弱组与快速衰弱组病人所有时间点的MMSE得分均低于稳定衰弱组且逐渐下降(P<0.01),而且快速衰弱组MMSE得分随时间下降速度更快(P<0.01);多重线性回归结果显示,无论是否调整变量,缓慢衰弱组和快速衰弱组的认知功能下降风险均高于稳定衰弱组(P<0.001)。 结论 老年慢性病多重用药病人衰弱症状随时间呈上升趋势,且衰弱轨迹呈异质性,与认知功能明显相关。临床上需针对不同衰弱轨迹病人制定个性化干预策略,加强对老年慢性病多重用药病人衰弱及认知功能的监测与管理。   

关键词: 老年慢性病, 多重用药, 衰弱, 发展轨迹, 认知功能

Abstract: Objective To explore the changes in frailty symptoms and cognitive function in the elderly patients with chronic diseases and polypharmacy, and to analyze the correlation between them. Methods The clinical data of 110 elderly patients with polypharmacy and chronic diseases who were treated in Zunyi First People’s Hospital from August 2023 to February 2024 were collected. On the day of the visit (T1), 6 months after the visit (T2), and 12 months after the visit (T3), Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) scale and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were used to assess the frailty symptoms and cognitive function in the patients. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation of frailty symptoms between the different time points. Mplus 8.3 software was used to construct a latent variable growth curve model (LGCM) to explore the development trajectory of frailty symptoms. According to the trajectory characteristics, 110 patients were divided into stable frailty group (n=58), slow frailty group (n=32) and rapid frailty group (n=20). The general characteristics of different trajectory categories were compared, and the score of MMSE among different trajectory groups at each time point was analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA. The correlations between frailty development trajectories and cognitive function were analyzed by multiple linear regression. Results The correlations of FFP scores between different time points in enrolled patients were all statistically significant (P<0.001), and FFP score at T3 was higher than that at T2 and T1 (P<0.05); The initial mean level of FFP was 1.543, and the differences among individuals were statistically significant (P<0.001). Frailty symptoms showed an overall increasing trend from T1 to T3, and the differences in rates of change among individuals were statistically significant (P<0.001). There were significant differences among the three trajectories in terms of age, body mass index, types of medication used, and types of diseases (P<0.01). Repeated measures ANOVA revealed that MMSE scores in the stable frailty group showed no significant changes from T1 to T3 (P>0.05). However, the slow frailty group and the rapid frailty group had significantly lower MMSE scores than the stable frailty group at all time points (P<0.01). Furthermore, the rate of decline in MMSE scores was significantly faster in the rapid frailty group compared to the slow frailty group (P<0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that, adjusting for variables or not, the risk of cognitive decline was higher in the slow frailty group and the rapid frailty group compared to the stable frailty group. Conclusions The frailty symptoms of elderly patients with chronic diseases and polypharmacy showed an increasing trend over time, and the frailty trajectory is heterogeneous, which is obviously related to cognitive function. Clinically, it is necessary to formulate personalized intervention strategies for patients with different frailty trajectories and strengthen the monitoring and management of frailty and cognitive function in elderly patients with chronic diseases and polypharmacy.    

Key words: geriatric chronic diseases, polypharmacy, frailty, developmental trajectory, cognitive function

中图分类号: