小骨窗微创手术用于治疗老年高血压性脑出血合并脑疝的疗效及其安全性

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2023.05.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较老年高血压性脑出血合并脑疝病人实施小骨窗微创手术与传统大骨瓣开颅手术治疗的临床疗效及其安全性之间的差异。方法回顾性分析76例老年高血压性脑出血合并脑疝手术病人的临床资料,按照手术方式分为小骨窗组和大骨瓣组,前者36例行小骨窗血肿清除术,后者40例行大骨瓣减压术。比较2组术后24 h内血肿清除率、瞳孔恢复率、脑疝恢复率和格拉斯哥昏迷评分法(GCS)评分;比较2组手术时间、手术切口长度、术中出血量及近远期临床疗效;统计2组术后2周并发症发生情况。结果 2组术后24 h内瞳孔恢复率、脑疝恢复率和GCS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但小骨窗组的血肿清除率低于大骨瓣组(P<0.05)。小骨窗组病人的手术时间、手术切口长度显著短于大骨瓣组,术中出血量显著少于大骨瓣组,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。术后2周,小骨窗组发生应激性溃疡发生率和切口愈合率均优于大骨瓣组(P<0.05或P<0.01),2组肺部感染发生率和再出血率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。小骨窗组近、远期预后良好率均优于大骨瓣组,分别为83.33%比62.50%、61.11%比35.00%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论小骨窗微创手术较大骨瓣开颅手术更适用于治疗老年高血压性脑出血合并脑疝的病人。

关键词: 脑出血, 高血压, 微创, 脑疝, 老年人, 小骨窗

Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety between minimally invasive surgery with small bone window and traditional large bone flap craniotomy in the elderly patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage complicated with cerebral herniation. Methods The clinical data of 76 elderly patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage complicated with brain herniation were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into the small bone window group(n=36, receiving minimally invasive surgery with small bone window) and the large bone flap group(n=40, receiving large bone flap craniotomy). The hematoma clearance rate, pupil recovery rate, brain hernia recovery rate and the score of Glasgow coma scale(GCS) within 24 hours after operation, operation time, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, and short-term and long-term clinical effects of the two groups were compared. The incidence of complications 2 weeks after operation in both groups was recorded. Results There were no differences in pupil recovery rate, brain hernia recovery rate and the score of GCS within 24 hours after operation between the two groups(P>0.05). The hematoma clearance rate was lower, the operative time and intraoperative blood loss were less, and the length of incision was shorter in the small bone window group than those in the large bone flap group(P<0.05 or P<0.01). The incidence rates of stress ulcer and wound healing in the small bone window group were better than those in the large bone flap group 2 weeks after operation(P<0.05 or P<0.01). However, there were no differences in the incidence rates of pulmonary infection and rebleeding beween the two groups (P>0.05). The short- and long-term good rates in the small bone window group were better than those in the large bone flap group(all P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with large bone flap craniotomy, minimally invasive surgery with small bone window is more suitable for the treatment of the elderly patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage complicated with brain herniation.

Key words: intracerebral hemorrhage, hypertension, minimally invasive, cerebral hernia, aged, small bone window

中图分类号:

R 743.34

夏恒, 石磊. 小骨窗微创手术用于治疗老年高血压性脑出血合并脑疝的疗效及其安全性[J]. 实用老年医学, 2023, 37(5): 487-490.

XIA Heng, SHI Lei. Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery with small bone window in the treatment of senile hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage complicated with cerebral herniation[J]. Practical Geriatrics, 2023, 37(5): 487-490.

参考文献

[1] SUN S, LI Y, ZHANG H, et al. Neuroendoscopic surgery versus craniotomy for supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2020, 134:477-488.
[2] RINCON F, MAYER S A. Intracerebral hemorrhage: getting ready for effective treatments[J]. Curr Opin Neurol, 2010, 23(1):59-64.
[3] TANG Y, YIN F, FU D, et al. Efficacy and safety of minimal invasive surgery treatment in hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Neurol, 2018, 18(1):136.
[4] HAYASHI T, KARIBE H, AKAMATSU Y, et al. Endoscopic hematoma evacuation for intracerebral hemorrhage under local anesthesia: factors that affect the hematoma removal rate[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 126:e1330-e1336.
[5] SUN G, FU T, LIU Z, et al. The rule of brain hematoma pressure gradient and its influence on hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage operation[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):4599.
[6] 骆明涛, 伍聪, 陶传元, 等. 《高血压性脑出血中国多学科诊治指南》急救诊治解读 [J]. 中国急救医学, 2021, 41(3):185-190.
[7] 李树良, 张建军, 王东. 微创手术治疗高血压脑出血患者的临床研究进展[J]. 医疗装备, 2020, 33(18):197-198.
[8] 杨波, 丁文学, 陶本章, 等. 控制性减压术与标准大骨瓣减压术防治老年重型颅脑损伤并发脑梗死的对照研究[J]. 实用老年医学, 2017, 31(3):245-248.
[9] 刘金辉, 王忠安, 龚光辉, 等. 超早期与早期微创手术治疗中等量基底节区高血压性脑出血的疗效比较 [J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2021, 21(2):117-120.
[10] 姜海鹏, 张凯, 王广斌, 等. 早期康复联合高压氧对急诊微创术后高血压脑出血患者神经功能恢复及预后的影响[J]. 中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志, 2021, 28(4):445-449.
[11] SHAO X, WANG Q, SHEN J, et al. Comparative study of micro-bone window and conventional bone window microsurgery for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2020, 31(4):1030-1033.
[12] WEN A Y, WU B T, XU X B, et al. Clinical study on the early application and ideal dosage of urokinase after surgery for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2018, 22(14):4663-4668.
[13] GUAN J, DING Y, LIU Y, et al. Circadian effects on outcome following surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage in humans?[J]. Brain Res, 2009, 1258:78-85.
[14] HAN S, YANG Y, YANG Z, et al. Continuous progression of hemorrhage of sphenoid ridge meningioma causing cerebral hernia:a case report and literature review[J]. Oncol Lett, 2020, 20(1):785-793.
[15] WANG G, LIU W, LI C, et al. Effect of minimally invasive surgery combined with intracranial pressure monitoring on neurological function recovery and quality of life in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021, 13(7):8076-8084.
[16] 周超. 高血压脑出血合并脑疝患者行开颅减压术前联合微创穿刺术的临床价值[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2021, 15(9):51-53.
[17] BROWN D A, WIJDICKS E F. Decompressive craniectomy in acute brain injury[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2017, 140:299-318.

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

755

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	755

下载来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	489	266
比例	65%	35%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	92

下载来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	3	90
比例	3%	97%