开展安宁缓和医疗对生命末期老年病人医疗状况影响的纵向研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2023.05.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的了解开展安宁缓和医疗(hospice and palliative care,HPC)对生命末期老年病人医疗状况的影响。方法连续查阅2014~2021年我院老年医学科死亡病人的病历,记录一般情况、心肺复苏意愿、生命支持手段的应用及临终前抢救措施。根据开展HPC教育及临床工作的时间(以2018年1月为界点),将病例分为2014~2017年、2018~2021年2组进行纵向研究;并对2018~2021年开展HPC期间的病人进行亚组分析。结果共纳入254例死亡病人:2014~2017年死亡131例,2018~2021年死亡123例。2组年龄、性别、入院时躯体功能状况、1年内住院次数、住院时间、死亡原因构成差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组口服药物数量、多重用药比例、呼吸机使用率、使用白蛋白情况差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组选择临终前不行心肺复苏及心外按压的比例差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),电除颤、简易呼吸器、血管活性药物、呼吸兴奋剂使用率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2020~2021年与2018~2019年相比,生命末期老年病人多重用药率(37.3%比51.4%,P<0.05)、临终前血管活性药物使用率(49.0%比77.8%,P<0.05)、呼吸兴奋剂使用率(15.7%比50.0%,P<0.05)进一步下降。结论对于老年生命末期病人,开展HPC能够减少部分生命支持手段的使用,降低临终前无效医疗的应用。

关键词: 安宁疗护, 缓和医疗, 生命末期, 老年人, 生命支持

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of hospice and palliative care(HPC) on medical treatment status of hospitalized elderly patients at the end of life. Methods The medical records of the dead elderly patients from 2014 to 2021 in the Department of Geriatrics of our hospital were reviewed retrospectively. The general information, willingness to cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR), application of life-sustaining treatments and end-of-life care measures were recorded. The patients were divided into 2014-2017 group(the patients did not receive HPC, n=131) and 2018-2021 group(the patients received HPC, n=123). Results There were no significant differences in age, gender, physical functional status, times of hospitalization in 1 year, length of hospitalization, cause of death between the two groups(P>0.05). There were significant differences in oral medication number, the proportions of polypharmacy, mechanical ventilation and albumin infusions between the two groups(P<0.05). There were no differences in the proportions of preference of do-not-resuscitate(DNR) and external cardiac compression between the two groups. The differences in the proportions of using electric defibrillation, bag mask ventilation, vasopressors and respiratory stimulant between the two groups were statistically significant(P＜0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that the proportions of polypharmacy(37.3% vs 51.4%, P<0.05), using vasopressors(49.0% vs 77.8%, P<0.05) and respiratory stimulant(15.7% vs 50.0%, P<0.05)were further decreased in 2020-2021 compared with 2018-2019. Conclusions For the elderly patients at the end of life, HPC can reduce the application of some life-sustaining treatment and futile medical resource use before death.

Key words: hospice, palliative care, end of life, aged, life-sustaining treatment

中图分类号:

R 48

刘国樑, 郑辉, 秦明照, 刘谦. 开展安宁缓和医疗对生命末期老年病人医疗状况影响的纵向研究[J]. 实用老年医学, 2023, 37(5): 479-482.

LIU Guo-liang, ZHENG Hui, QIN Ming-zhao, LlU Qian. Effects of hospice and palliative care on medical treatment of end-of-life elderly patients: a longitudinal study[J]. Practical Geriatrics, 2023, 37(5): 479-482.

参考文献

[1] 刘谦,秦明照,周健,等. 北京某三甲医院老年科患者生命末期医疗照护状况分析[J].中国临床保健杂志,2019,22(2):156-160.
[2] 刘谦,周健,秦明照,等. 癌与非癌老年患者生命末期医疗状况的分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2020,39(5):573-577.
[3] MOORE D C, PAYNE S, VAN DEN BLOCK L, et al. Strategies for the implementation of palliative care education and organizational interventions in long-term care facilities: a scoping review[J]. Palliat Med,2020,34(5):558-570.
[4] WIDERA E. Primary palliative care[J]. Med Clin North Am, 2020,104(3):xvii-xviii.
[5] QUILL T E, ABERNETHY A P. Generalist plus specialist palliative care-creating a more sustainable model[J]. N Engl J Med,2013,368(13):1173-1175.
[6] LUTA X, MAESSEN M,EGGER M,et al. Measuring intensity of end of life care: a systematic review[J]. PLoS One,2015,10(4):e0123764.
[7] LIU Q, QIN M, ZHOU J, et al.Can primary palliative care education change life-sustaining treatment intensity of older adults at the end of life? A retrospective study[J].BMCPalliat Care,2021,20(1):84.
[8] DRUWE P, BENOIT D D, MONSIEURS K G, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults over 80: outcome and the perception of appropriateness by clinicians[J].J Am Geriatr Soc,2020,68(1):39-45.
[9] TALEBREZA S, McPHERSON M L. Recognizing and managing polypharmacy in advanced illness[J]. Med Clin North Am,2020,104(3):405-413.
[10] AREVALO J J, GEIJTEMAN E C T, HUISMAN B A A, et al. Medication use in the last days of life in hospital, hospice, and home settings in the Netherlands[J]. J Palliat Med,2018,21(2):149-155.
[11] BEAL S K, CHANG H J, BYUN J M, et al. The association between end-of-life care and the time interval between provision of a do-not-resuscitate consent and death in cancer patients in Korea[J]. Cancer Res Treat,2017,49(2):502-508.
[12] KIM S H, KANG S, SONG M K. Intensity of Care at the end of life among older adults in Korea[J].J Palliat Care,2018,33(1):47-52.

[1]	丛晓飞, 李铭麟, 石春来. 老年口腔衰弱与多重用药的关系及干预策略[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(9): 872-875.
[2]	李毛毛, 张飞, 沈鑫, 李洁华. 老年人口腔衰弱与跌倒关系的研究进展[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(9): 876-879.
[3]	张飞, 李毛毛, 李铭麟, 王佳贺. 老年人口腔衰弱与抑郁症的相关性研究进展[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(9): 884-888.
[4]	李江, 邱雁, 王婷, 王丹, 虞一帆, 濮玲丽, 卜玲. 老年肺腺癌病人术前全身免疫炎症指数/血清白蛋白与临床病理特征的相关性研究[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(9): 893-896.
[5]	戴静, 崔焱. 糖化血红蛋白变异性与老年2型糖尿病病人认知功能障碍的相关性分析[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(9): 931-935.
[6]	张星星, 张海洋, 何小菁, 鲁翔. 不同肥胖指标与老年人糖尿病患病风险的调查研究[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(9): 940-943.
[7]	倪红艳, 陈云, 张其兵, 马一鸣, 解成兰. 电针对老年病人下肢骨科手术围术期认知功能及炎症因子的影响[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(9): 944-947.
[8]	李晓敏, 李晓林, 栗杰, 吴蕾, 郝冉冉. 老年病人经肛双气囊小肠镜进镜效率及其影响因素研究[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(9): 958-961.
[9]	孙露露, 周玉洁, 董珊, 周明飞, 殷小莉, 逄天宇, 颜恺然, 周冕, 袁玲. 基于嵌入性理论医养安宁疗护服务模式的构建[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(9): 962-967.
[10]	蔡荟萃, 陈燕, 王燕, 叶劲军, 朱钰颖. 多形式健康教育模式联合简易呼吸功能锻炼对老年肺癌放疗病人癌因性疲乏及遵医行为的影响[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(9): 968-972.
[11]	李湘, 栗萱, 田应选. 肺衰老与慢性呼吸系统疾病研究现状及进展[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(8): 761-765.
[12]	王小娇, 王宁, 崔宏, 叶童, 王晓明. 运动康复对老年轻中度慢性心力衰竭病人的疗效评价[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(8): 775-778.
[13]	郝世杰, 邹建鹏, 卫晨, 刘清江. 综合呼吸训练对老年帕金森病病人运动减少型构音障碍的影响[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(8): 783-787.
[14]	向超, 罗彩东. 心电图avL导联T波变化对老年冠心病病人冠脉狭窄程度的诊断价值[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(8): 788-791.
[15]	李慧颖, 蔡力力, 朱启伟. 血浆N末端脑钠肽前体对高龄左室肥厚病人预后的预测价值[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(8): 797-801.