老年糖尿病核心护理结局指标体系的构建

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2021.09.023

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的构建老年DM住院病人核心护理结局指标体系,为评价临床护理措施成效提供依据。方法以护理结局分类系统为框架,采用Delphi专家咨询法修订护理结局。结果两轮专家咨询权威系数分别为0.87和0.91,专家意见协调系数分别为0.189～0.305、0.203～0.305(均P<0.05)。确立的核心结局包含生理健康、健康知识和行为、心理社会健康3个领域,共8项结局和35个指标。结论本结局指标具有一定的科学性与可靠性,可用于评估老年DM病人护理结局,可为临床护理工作提供指导。

关键词: 糖尿病, 老年人, 护理结局分类, 评估指标

Abstract: Objective To develop a set of assessment indicators of core nursing outcomes for the elderly patients with diabetes, so as to provide basis for nursing assessment. Methods Delphi expert consultation method was adopted to revise the outcomes and indicators based on nursing outcomes classification. Results Authority coefficient of 2-round expert consultation was 0.87 and 0.91,and Kendall’s W coefficient was 0.189-0.305 and 0.203-0.305 (P<0.05), respectively. The final system consisted of three fields including physiological health, health knowledge and behavior, psychological and social health, with a total of eight outcomes and thirty-five indicators. Conclusions This assessment system is scientific and reliable. It can be used to evaluate nursing outcomes of the elderly patients with diabetes, and provide reference for clinical nursing.

Key words: diabetes, aged, nursing outcomes classification, assessment indicator

中图分类号:

R 473.5

何英姿, 钱艳, 孙林芳. 老年糖尿病核心护理结局指标体系的构建[J]. 实用老年医学, 2021, 35(9): 986-990.

HE Ying-zi, QIAN Yan, SUN Lin-fang. Development of core nursing outcome indicators for elderly patients with diabetes[J]. Practical Geriatrics, 2021, 35(9): 986-990.

参考文献

[1] International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 9th Edition 2019[EB/OL]. [2020-09-13] https://diabetesatlas.org/en/sections/demographic-and-geographic-outline.html.
[2] KHAMBATY T, CALLAHAN C, PERKINS A, et al. Depression and anxiety screens as simultaneous predictors of 10-year incidence of diabetes mellitus in older adults in primary care[J]. J Am Geriatri Soc, 2017, 65(2):294-300.
[3] 刘雪莲, 李春卉. 糖尿病痛苦对社区老年糖尿病患者生活质量的影响研究[J]. 吉林医药学院学报, 2018, 39(1):14-16.
[4] MOORHEAD S, JOHNSON M, MASS M, et al. Nursing outcomes classification (NOC)[M]. Atlanta: Mosby, 2013.
[5] 金诗晓, 胡莉萍, 曹姗姗, 等. 基于《护理结局分类》构建脑出血患者护理结局指标的研究[J]. 现代临床护理, 2019, 18(4):20-26.
[6] NANDA International Inc. NANDA International 护理诊断:定义与分类2018～2020[M]. 台北: 华杏出版社, 2018.
[7] SUE M, MARION J, MERIDEAN M. 护理结局分类[M]. 3版. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2006.
[8] 潘靖菁, 高钰琳, 王惠珍, 等. 本科护生临床带教老师核心能力体系构建研究[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(9):1-7.
[9] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2017年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2018, 10(1):4-67.
[10] 刘墩秀, 丁福, 刘欣彤, 等. 老年专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建研究[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2016, 33(13):16-19.
[11] 程琮, 刘一志, 王如德. Kendall 协调系数W检验及其SPSS实现[J]. 泰山医学院学报, 2010, 31(7):487-490.
[12] YAU C K, ENG C, CENZER I S, et al. Glycosylated hemoglobin and functional decline in community-dwelling nursing home-eligible elderly adults with diabetes mellitus[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2012, 60(7):1215-1221.
[13] 黄玉玲, 吴琳娜, 曾忠仪, 等. 老年2型糖尿病患者控糖效果影响因素研究[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2020, 33(1):49-53.
[14] GARBER A J, ABRAHAMSON M J, BARZILAY J I, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management--2017 executive[J]. Endocr Pract, 2017, 23(2):207-238.
[15] LEE A A, PIETTE J D, HEISLER M, et al. Diabetes self-management and glycemic control: the role of autonomy support from informal health supporters.[J]. Health Psychol, 2019, 38(2):122-132.
[16] 李冬静, 邢凤梅, 董春艳, 等. 基于自我效能理论的护理干预对老年糖尿病病人饮食自我管理行为的长期影响[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(5):897-899.
[17] 何叶, 绳宇. 空巢老年糖尿病患者自我管理水平和生存质量的相关性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2013, 48(2):136-138.
[18] 张松, 张红光. 老年2型糖尿病患者抑郁焦虑与生命质量的关系[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(4):938-940.