基于体表解剖标志的穿刺路径规划在老年丘脑内囊型出血引流术中的应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2024.11.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评价基于体表解剖标志的路径规划在老年丘脑内囊型出血血肿引流术中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析丘脑内囊型出血行引流手术的175例老年病人,其中接受体表解剖标志路径规划血肿引流术的91例病人纳入研究组,行立体定向血肿引流术的84例病人纳入对照组;比较2组病人路径规划时间、术后再出血情况、置管准确率、血肿清除率、术后并发脑积水、治疗有效率、预后良好率等指标间的差异。结果研究组与对照组路径规划时间分别为(7.4±2.6) min、(40.5±10.5)min,2组间差异有统计学意义 (P<0.01);研究组与对照组置管准确率、术后再出血、血肿清除率、术后并发脑积水、治疗有效率、预后良好率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论基于体表解剖标志规划路径的血肿引流术治疗老年丘脑内囊型出血,方法简单,路径规划时间短,置管准确率高,手术效果与立体定向血肿引流术基本一致。

关键词: 老年人, 丘脑内囊型出血, 体表解剖标志, 路径规划, 引流术

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the application value of puncture path planning based on surface anatomical markers in the elderly patients undergoing drainage surgery for thalamus and internal capsule hematoma. Methods The clinical data of 175 elderly patients with thalamus and internal capsule hematoma who underwent drainage surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 91 patients using surface anatomical landmarks to plan the puncture path for drainage were enrolled in the study group, and 84 patients receiving stereotactic hematoma drainage were enrolled in the control group. The differences in path planning time, postoperative rebleeding rate, catheter placement accuracy, hematoma clearance rate, postoperative concurrent hydrocephalus, treatment efficiency and good prognosis rate between the two groups were compared. Results The path planning time showed significant difference between the study group and the control group (7.4±2.6 min vs 40.5±10.5 min, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in catheter placement accuracy, postoperative rebleeding rate, hematoma clearance rate, postoperative concurrent hydrocephalus, treatment effectiveness and good prognosis rate between the study group and the control group (P>0.05). Conclusions The application of puncture path planning based on surface anatomical markers in the elderly patients undergoing drainage surgery for thalamus and internal capsule hematoma can shorten path planning time with accuracy. The surgical effect is consistent with stereotactic surgery.

Key words: aged, thalamus and internal capsule hematoma, surface anatomical markers, path planning, drainage

中图分类号:

R 743.3

贾宝铭, 赵建凯, 张颜礼, 冯国强, 周西广, 裴红莎, 汪丽珍, 库洪彬. 基于体表解剖标志的穿刺路径规划在老年丘脑内囊型出血引流术中的应用[J]. 实用老年医学, 2024, 38(11): 1126-1130.

JIA Baoming, ZHAO Jiankai, ZHANG Yanli, FENG Guoqiang, ZHOU Xiguang, PEI Hongsha, WANG Lizhen, KU Hongbin. Application of puncture path planning based on surface anatomical markers in elderly patients undergoing drainage surgery for thalamus and internal capsule hematoma[J]. Practical Geriatrics, 2024, 38(11): 1126-1130.

参考文献

[1] NEISEWANDER B L, HU K, TAN Z, et al. Location of thalamic hemorrhage impacts prognosis[J].World Neurosurg, 2018, 116: e525-e533.
[2] ZHANG Y, KHAN S, LIU Y, et al. Oxidative stress following intracerebral hemorrhage: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic targets[J].Front Immunol, 2022, 13: 847246.
[3] 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国脑出血诊治指南(2019)[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2019, 52(12): 994-1005.
[4] 中华医学会神经外科学分会, 中国医师协会急诊医师分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组, 等. 高血压性脑出血中国多学科诊治指南[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2020, 36(8): 757-770.
[5] 库洪彬,孟志勇,张卫民,等. CTA点征在中等量脑出血超早期手术方式选择中的应用价值分析[J]. 中华神经医学杂志,2020,19(7):689-694.
[6] NAKAGAWA K, KING S L, SETO T B. Optimal hematoma volume cut point to predict functional outcome after basal ganglia and thalamic hemorrhages[J]. Front Neurol, 2018, 9:291.
[7] CHANG S I, TSAI M D, YEN D H, et al. The clinical predictors of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2018, 28(1): 36-42.
[8] 徐华中,黄保胜.自发性脑室出血后脑积水的危险因素分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2020, 23(16): 1381-1385.
[9] HANLEY D F, THOMPSON R E, ROSENBLUM M, et al. Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery with thrombolysis in intracerebral haemorrhagee vacuation (MISTIE III): a randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded endpointphase 3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2019, 393(10175):1021-1032.
[10] 陈霞, 李佳林, 沈云龙, 等. 颅脑穿刺导引器辅助微创血肿清除术治疗幕上高血压脑出血[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2022, 48(7): 431-436.
[11] MACISAAC R L, ALI M, TAYLOR-ROWAN M, et al. Use of a 3-item short-from version of the Barthel index for use in stroke: systematic review and external validation[J]. Stroke, 2017,48 (3): 618-623.
[12] 王宇, 综述, 陶英群,等. 小量丘脑出血立体定向微创手术治疗进展[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2019, 24(8): 382-384.
[13] 张卫民, 高海晓, 张兰, 等. 局部脑血流量在少量基底节出血手术决策中的应用[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2023, 49(7): 385-390.
[14] ABUNIMER A M, ABOU-AL-SHAAR H, CAVALLO C, et al. Minimally invasive approaches for the management of intraventricular hemorrhage[J]. J Neurosurg Sci, 2018, 62(6): 734-744.
[15] 张谦,冀瑞俊, 赵萌, 等. 中国脑血管病临床管理指南(第2版)(节选):第5章脑出血临床管理[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2023, 18(9): 1014-1023.
[16] 中国急诊急救神经内镜治疗高血压性脑出血协作组, 中国医药教育协会神经内镜与微创医学专业委员会, 中华医学会神经外科分会. 2020 神经内镜下高血压性脑出血手术治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2020, 100(33): 2579-2585.
[17] MORIOKA M, ORITO K. Management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage[J].Neurol Med Chir: Tokyo, 2017, 57(11):563-574.
[18] 伍学斌, 康强, 曾胜田, 等. 3D-Slicer联合Sina软件在高血压脑出血神经内镜手术的应用[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2018, 23(8):363-365.
[19] 库洪彬, 孟志勇, 张颜礼, 等. 简化增强现实技术在老年幕上脑出血引流术前穿刺点定位中的应用价值分析[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2021, 20(4): 389-392.
[20] YE W, ZHANG X, LI T, et al. Mixed-reality hologram for diagnosis and surgical planning of double outlet of the right ventricle: a pilot study[J]. Clin Radiol, 2021, 76(3):237.e1-237.e7.
[21] TERAMOTO S, YAMAMOTO T, NAKAO Y, et al. Novel anatomic classification of spontaneous thalamic hemorrhage classified by vascular territory of thalamus[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 104:452-458.