实用老年医学 ›› 2024, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 1086-1090.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2024.11.002

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

老年病人医院获得性压力性损伤相关指标分析

沈圆娟, 诸建华, 高娟娟, 孙敏, 李菊云   

  1. 210029 江苏省南京市, 南京中医药大学附属医院(江苏省中医院)消化系肿瘤外科(沈圆娟, 孙敏, 李菊云);伤口护理门诊(诸建华);泌尿外科(高娟娟)
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-01 出版日期:2024-11-20 发布日期:2024-11-21
  • 通讯作者: 李菊云,Email:lijuyunfly@126.com

Analysis of relevant indicators of hospital-acquired pressure injury in elderly patients

SHEN Yuanjuan, ZHU Jianhua, GAO Juanjuan, SUN Min, LI Juyun   

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology(SHEN Yuanjuan, SUN Min, LI Juyun); Wound Care Clinic(ZHU Jianhua);Department of Urology (GAO Juanjuan), Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2024-09-01 Online:2024-11-20 Published:2024-11-21
  • Contact: LI Juyun,Email:lijuyunfly@126.com

摘要: 目的 分析老年病人医院获得性压力性损伤的相关指标,为临床预防与管理提供依据。 方法 回顾性收集2021—2023年南京中医药大学附属医院49例2期及以上老年医院获得性压力性损伤病人的资料,分析其临床特征,并运用Apriori算法对不良事件管理系统中报告的原因要素进行关联分析。 结果 49例病人发生了53处压力性损伤,92.45%(49/53)为2期压力性损伤,35.85%(19/53)发生在骶尾部,病人多来自重症监护室(ICU)与外科病房;81.63%(40/49)病人血红蛋白水平<120 g/L,75.51%(37/49)病人血清白蛋白<35 g/L;Braden量表评估发现,半数发生压力性损伤的病人被评定为低风险;Apriori算法关联分析挖掘出护理过程中23对强关联规则风险因素。 结论 针对老年病人的生理特点,临床应重视高危病区和高危人群的预防管理,加强营养管理和皮肤状况监测,科学制定压力性损伤预防管理方案。同时,需结合临床判断,优化风险评估,以降低医院获得性压力性损伤发生率。

关键词: 医院获得性压力性损伤, 临床特征, 风险评估, 护理管理

Abstract: Objective To analyze the relevant indicators of hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) in the elderly patients, and to provide a basis for clinical prevention and management. Methods A retrospective analysis of the data of 49 elderly patients with stage 2 or above HAPI in Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from 2021 to 2023 was conducted. The clinical characteristics of the patients with HAPI were analyzed, and Apriori algorithm was used to analyze the causal factors in adverse event reports system. Results Among the 49 patients, 53 pressure injuries occurred, 92.45%(49/53) being stage 2 pressure injuries, and 35.85% (19/53) occurring at the sacral area. Most patients were from Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and surgical wards. 81.63%(40/49) of the patients had a hemoglobin level of less than 120 g/L, and 75.51%(37/49) had a serum albumin level of less than 35 g/L. Braden Scale assessment showed that almost half of the patients were defined as low risk. Apriori algorithm association analysis identified 23 pairs of strong-association risk factors during nursing process. Conclusions In response to the physiological characteristics of elderly patients, clinical practice should focus on the prevention and management of high-risk wards and populations, strengthen nutritional management and skin condition monitoring, and scientifically formulate pressure injury prevention and management plans. At the same time, it is necessary to combine clinical judgment to optimize risk assessment and reduce the incidence of HAPI.

Key words: hospital-acquired pressure injury, clinical characteristics, risk assessment, nursing management

中图分类号: