实用老年医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 37-40.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2025.01.009

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

临床生理弹性评估量表在老年住院病人中的信效度检验

刘川, 潘一鸣, 于文华, 张婉淑, 李嘉潼, 李夏夏, 邢怡文, 李静, 马丽娜   

  1. 100053 北京市,首都医科大学宣武医院老年医学科,国家老年疾病临床研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-21 出版日期:2025-01-20 发布日期:2025-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 马丽娜,Email: malina0883@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    高层次公共卫生技术人才建设项目(学科骨干-03-14);北京市属医学科研院所公益发展改革试点项目(JYY2023-13);首都医科大学临床专科学院(系)培养基金开放课题(CCMU2022ZKYXZ007)

Reliability and validity of the Clinical pHysical rEsilience assEssment Scale (CHEES) in elderly inpatients

LIU Chuan, PAN Yiming, YU Wenhua, ZHANG Wanshu, LI Jiatong, LI Xiaxia, XING Yiwen, LI Jing, MA Lina   

  1. Department of Geriatrics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, China National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Medicine, Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2024-03-21 Online:2025-01-20 Published:2025-01-15
  • Contact: MA Lina, Email: malina0883@126.com

摘要: 目的 在我国老年住院病人中对临床生理弹性评估量表(CHEES)进行信效度检验。方法 选取362例60岁及以上的老年住院病人进行调查。信度检验采用Cronbach’s α系数和分半信度Spearman-Brown系数、Guttman系数,效度检验采用内容效度和基于探索性因子分析法的结构效度进行评价。结果 CHEES量表接受率为90.88%,量表合格率为100%。总量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.826,分半信度Spearman-Brown系数为0.737、Guttman系数为0.731。量表的条目制定依据充分,专家咨询过程权威可靠,涵盖内容全面。探索性因子分析提取出3个公因子,各条目因子负荷为0.446~0.656,累计方差贡献率为57.49%。结论 CHEES量表具有较好的信度和效度,适合医院环境下老年人生理弹性的评估。

关键词: 生理弹性, 量表, 老年人, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Clinical pHysical rEsilience assEssment Scale (CHEES) in the elderly inpatients in China. Methods A total of 362 elderly inpatients aged 60 years and over were enrolled in this study. Cronbach’s α coefficient, Spearman-Brown coefficient and Guttman coefficient were used for reliability test. Validity was assessed by content validity and construct validity based on exploratory factor analysis. Results The acceptance rate of CHEES was 90.88%, and the qualified rate of the scale was 100%. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total scale was 0.826, Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.737, and Guttman coefficient was 0.731. The items of the scale were based on sufficient basis, and the expert consultation process was authoritative and reliable, and the content was comprehensive. Exploratory factor analysis extracted three common factors. The factor load of each item was 0.446-0.656, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 57.49%. Conclusions CHEES has good reliability and validity, and is suitable for the evaluation of physical resilience of the older adults in the hospital environment.

Key words: physical resilience, scale, aged, reliability, validity

中图分类号: