实用老年医学 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 386-390.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2023.04.016

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

GLIM标准和PG-SGA在老年中晚期肿瘤病人营养不良诊断中的一致性评价

吉琳琳, 张欣悦, 金超, 李世阳, 杨勤兵   

  1. 102218 北京市,清华大学附属北京清华长庚医院临床营养科
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-21 出版日期:2023-04-20 发布日期:2023-03-31
  • 通讯作者: 杨勤兵,Email:yangqinbing@126.com

Consistency asscessment of global leadership initiative on malnutrition criteria and patient-generated subjective global assessment in diagnosing malnutrition among elderly patients with advanced cancer

JI Lin-lin, ZHANG Xin-yue, JIN Chao, LI Shi-yang, YANG Qin-bing   

  1. Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing 102218, China
  • Received:2022-03-21 Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-03-31
  • Contact: YANG Qin-bing, Email: yangqinbing@126.com

摘要: 目的 比较全球领导人营养不良倡议(GLIM)标准和病人主观整体评估(PG-SGA)在老年中晚期肿瘤病人营养不良诊断中的一致性。方法 对288例老年中晚期肿瘤病人进行营养风险筛查2002(NRS2002)和PG-SGA评估,再对NRS2002≥3分者采用GLIM标准进行营养评定。比较GLIM标准和PG-SGA诊断老年中晚期肿瘤病人营养不良的一致性。结果 入组病人NRS2002评分为(3.33±1.34)分,营养风险发生率为71.18%(205/288),不同性别、年龄、肿瘤部位及分期病人的营养风险发生率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。采用GLIM标准诊断营养不良的发生率为58.33%(168/288),采用PG-SGA诊断营养不良的发生率为69.79%(201/288)。根据PG-SGA或GLIM标准,性别、年龄、肿瘤部位和分期均是老年中晚期肿瘤病人营养不良的影响因素(P<0.05)。Kappa检验显示,GLIM标准和PG-SGA诊断老年中晚期肿瘤病人营养不良的一致性较好(Kappa=0.71,P<0.01);按病人的一般情况分层,GLIM和PG-SGA诊断不同性别、年龄、肿瘤部位及分期病人营养不良的一致性良好,其Kappa值为0.63~0.78。结论 老年中晚期肿瘤病人营养风险和营养不良的发生率较高,GLIM标准和PG-SGA诊断老年中晚期肿瘤病人营养不良的一致性良好。

关键词: 营养风险筛查, 营养不良, 病人主观整体评估, 全球领导人营养不良倡议

Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of global leadership initiative on malnutrition (GLIM) criteria and patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) in evaluating malnutrition among the elderly patients with advanced cancer. Methods A total of 288 elderly patients with advanced cancer were screened by nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS2002) and PG-SGA, then those patients with NRS2002 score≥3 were evaluated with GLIM.The consistency of GLIM criteria and PG-SGA in diagnosing malnutrition among the elderly patients with advanced cancer was analyzed. Results The NRS2002 score of the patients was 3.33±1.34, and the incidence rate of nutritional risk was 71.18% (205/288).There were significant differences in the incidence rates of nutritional risk among the patients with different genders, ages, tumor locations and stages (P<0.05).The incidence rate of malnutrition assessed by GLIM criteria was 58.33% (168/288), which was 69.79% assessed by PG-SGA.According to PG-SGA or GLIM criteria, gender, age, tumor location and stage were the influencing factors of malnutrition in the elderly patients with advanced cancer (P<0.05). Kappa test showed that GLIM criteria and PG-SGA had good consistency in the diagnosis of malnutrition among the elderly patients with advanced cancer (Kappa=0.71,P<0.01).Stratified by the general condition of the patients, GLIM criteria and PG-SGA had good consistency in diagnosing malnutrition in different genders, ages, tumor locations and stages, and their Kappa values ranged from 0.63 to 0.78. Conclusions The incidence rates of nutritional risk and malnutrition are high among the elderly patients with advanced cancer. GLIM criteria and PG-SGA have good consistency in diagnosing malnutrition among the elderly patients with advanced cancer.

Key words: nutritional risk screening, malnutrition, patient-generated subjective global assessment, global leadership initiative on malnutrition

中图分类号: