股骨颈动力交叉固定系统与全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2023.09.014

实用老年医学 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 920-924.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2023.09.014

股骨颈动力交叉固定系统与全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较

王浩然, 秦虎, 朱齐飞, 范磊, 杜江

210011 江苏省南京市,南京医科大学第二附属医院骨科

收稿日期:2022-11-10 出版日期:2023-09-20 发布日期:2023-09-21
通讯作者: 杜江,Email:dujdujduj@163.com
基金资助:
2020年江苏省卫建委课题面上项目(M2020059);2022年江苏省老年健康科研面上项目(LKM2022007)

Comparison of curative effect of femoral neck dynamic cross fixation system (FNS) and total hip replacement in the treatment for femoral neck fracture

WANG Hao-ran, QIN Hu, ZHU Qi-fei, FAN Lei, DU Jiang

Department of Orthopaedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, China

Received:2022-11-10 Online:2023-09-20 Published:2023-09-21
Contact: DU Jiang, Email:dujdujduj@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的对比股骨颈动力交叉固定系统(FNS)与全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析2020年1月至2022年10月收住的128例股骨颈骨折病人的临床资料,均为GardenⅢ型,选取采用全髋关节置换术的20例纳入全髋关节置换组,选取采用FNS治疗的20例纳入FNS组。记录2组骨折复位的质量、手术时间、术中出血、骨折愈合时间、术后并发症发生率,并在术后3个月随访时进行疼痛VAS评分以及髋关节功能Harris评分的评估。结果 2组疼痛VAS评分以及髋关节功能Harris评分差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。FNS组手术时间以及出血量明显低于全髋关节置换组(P＜0.01)。结论与全髋关节置换相比,FNS具有手术创伤小、手术时间短、手术出血量少的优势。

关键词: 股骨颈骨折, 股骨颈动力交叉固定系统, 全髋关节置换

Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy of femoral neck dynamic cross fixation system (FNS) and total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fracture. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 128 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2020 to October 2022. Among them, 20 cases were treated with total hip arthroplasty and 20 cases were treated with FNS. All cases were GardenⅢtype. The quality of fracture reduction, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, fracture healing time and incidence of postoperative complications were recorded, and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain perception and Harris hip joint function score were evaluated three months later. Results There were no statistical differences in VAS score and Harris score of hip joint function between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and bleeding volume in the FNS group were significantly lower than those in the total joint replacement group (P<0.01). Conclusions Compared with total hip replacement, FNS shows the advantages of less trauma, shorter operation time and less blood loss.

Key words: femoral neck fracture, femoral neck dynamic cross fixation system, total hip replacement

中图分类号:

R 683.42

王浩然, 秦虎, 朱齐飞, 范磊, 杜江. 股骨颈动力交叉固定系统与全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J]. 实用老年医学, 2023, 37(9): 920-924.

WANG Hao-ran, QIN Hu, ZHU Qi-fei, FAN Lei, DU Jiang. Comparison of curative effect of femoral neck dynamic cross fixation system (FNS) and total hip replacement in the treatment for femoral neck fracture[J]. Practical Geriatrics, 2023, 37(9): 920-924.

参考文献

[1] 胡涛.全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2017,20(1):56-57.
[2] 宋宝东,浦瑶瑶,赵洪伟.老年股骨颈骨折患者全髋关节置换术不同手术时机对术后髋关节功能及并发症的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(14):3406-3407.
[3] 李英,徐艳华,郭孟果,等.早期下床活动对人工全髋关节置换患者术后并发症和髋关节功能的影响[J].中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(2):155-159.
[4] 冉学军,蒲川成,胡敏,等.保留修复后方关节囊及韧带对防止人工髋关节置换术后脱位的作用[J].临床骨科杂志,2015,18(3):314-317.
[5] 侯洪涛,陈柯,仝昭方,等.老年GardenⅢ与Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折闭合复位内固定术疗效比较[J].中国医学创新,2016,13(23):49-52.
[6] MASSON M, PARKER M,FLEISCHER S. Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2003(2):CD001708.
[7] PARKER M, CAWLEY S, PALIAL V. Internal fixation of intracapsular fractures of the hip using a dynamic locking plate: two-year follow-up of 320 patients[J]. Bone Joint J, 2013,95-B(10):1402-1405.
[8] OKIKE K, UDOGWU UN, ISAAC M, et al.Not all garden-I and II femoral neck fractures in the elderly should be fixed: effect of posterior tilt on rates of subsequent arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2019,101(20):1852-1859.
[9] LOWE J A, CRIST B D, BHANDARI M, et al. Optimal treatment of femoral neck fractures according to patient's physiologic age: an evidence-based review[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2010,41(2):157-166.
[10] RAMADANOV N, TOMA I, HERKNER H, et al.Factors that influence the complications and outcomes of femoral neck fractures treated by cannulated screw fixation[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1):758.
[11] XU D F, BI F G, MA C Y, et al. A systematic review of undisplaced femoral neck fracture treatments for patients over 65 years of age, with a focus on union rates and avascular necrosis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2017, 12(1):28.
[12] FELTON J, SLOBOGEAN G P, JACKSON S S, et al.Femoral neck shortening after hip fracture fixation is associated with inferior hip function: results from the FAITH trial[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2019,33(10):487-496.
[13] BHANDARI M, TORNETTA P 3rd, HANSON B, et al. Optimal internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: multiple screws or sliding hip screws?[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2009,23(6):403-407.
[14] SLOBOGEAN G P, SPRAGUE S,BZOVSKY S,et al. Fixation using alternative implants for the treatment of hip fractures (FAITH-2): design and rationale for a pilot multi-centre 2×2 factorial randomized controlled trial in young femoral neck fracture patients[J]. Pilot Feasibility Stud,2019, 5:70.
[15] STOFFEL K, ZDERIC I, GRAS F, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the femoral neck system in unstable pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fractures: a comparison with the dynamic hip screw and cannulated screws[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2017,31(3):131-137.
[16] 李颂.半髋和全髋置换治疗老年GardenⅢ～Ⅳ股骨颈骨折的比较分析[J].现代诊断与治疗,2015,26(24):5700-5701.
[17] 马承榕,曹扬.股骨颈骨折手术方式选择[J].国际骨科学杂志,2022,43(03):139-142.
[18] 于乐,杨坤.外翻性股骨颈骨折患者发生股骨头缺血性坏死和内固定失败的危险因素研究[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2018,11(10):746-750.
[19] 李明东,王丹,高星,等.手术方式和手术时间对老年髋部骨折术后深静脉血栓发生率的影响[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2017,6(5):375-378.

股骨颈动力交叉固定系统与全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较

Comparison of curative effect of femoral neck dynamic cross fixation system (FNS) and total hip replacement in the treatment for femoral neck fracture

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

Metrics

推荐阅读 10

[1]	沈林华, 蔡程名, 魏晨, 史本海, 董雨青. 空心螺钉联合三维蜂窝导向器定位植钉治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床效果[J]. 实用老年医学, 2023, 37(7): 700-704.
[2]	卢俊松, 吕国荣, 田龙, 何涛, 严纯, 陈路, 杨志强. 老年股骨颈骨折手术病人1年死亡率调查及其预测模型的构建[J]. 实用老年医学, 2023, 37(2): 151-155.
[3]	孙晓燕, 张振恩, 李同, 徐军. 目标导向液体治疗联合超声动态监测血管外肺水在老年全髋关节置换病人液体管理中的应用[J]. 实用老年医学, 2023, 37(12): 1210-1214.
[4]	贾德卫, 邵明, 凌坤, 邱伟, 余利民. 人工全髋关节置换术与内固定治疗老年不稳定性股骨转子间骨折对比研究[J]. 实用老年医学, 2016, 30(1): 54-.
[5]	杨燕, 张运琼. 右美托咪定用于老年全髋关节置换术的临床观察及对患者炎症因子的影响[J]. 实用老年医学, 2015, 29(9): 766-.
[6]	夏铁成, 王明昊, 郝建学, 苏旻罡, 常志, 李军, 刘锁利, 万建设. 年股骨颈形态与骨折类型的相关性分析[J]. 实用老年医学, 2014, 28(4): 284-.