实用老年医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 427-432.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2026.04.019

• 循证医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

老年慢性心力衰竭患者多重用药管理的最佳证据总结

史超雄, 钱丽君, 卢妙, 庞斯斯, 王森, 夏丽莉, 肖苏婉, 李婷茹, 汤一帆   

  1. 210029 江苏省南京市,江苏省人民医院(南京医科大学第一附属医院)老年心血管科
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-25 出版日期:2026-04-23 发布日期:2026-04-23
  • 通讯作者: 钱丽君,Email:lijunqian@njmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(82102073);江苏省老年健康科研立项面上项目(LKM2025001)

Summary of the best evidence for polypharmacy management in elderly patients with chronic heart failure

SHI Chaoxiong, QIAN Lijun, LU Miao, PANG Sisi, WANG Sen, XIA Lili, XIAO Suwan, LI Tingru, TANG Yifan   

  1. Department of Geriatric Cardiology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2025-08-25 Online:2026-04-23 Published:2026-04-23
  • Contact: QIAN Lijun, Email:lijunqian@njmu.edu.cn

摘要: 目的 总结老年CHF患者多重用药管理的最佳证据,为临床医护人员评估用药、优化管理提供循证依据。 方法 依据6S模型,检索UpToDate、BMJ Best Practice、JBI循证实践数据库、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南网站、医脉通、Cochrane Library、Embase、PubMed、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、中国生物医学文献数据库,检索时限为建库至2025年3月。采用PIPOST模式明确循证问题,纳入的文献类型包括指南、证据总结、系统评价、专家共识及临床决策。由两名研究者独立进行文献筛选、质量评价与证据提取,冲突由第三人协商解决。最终对提取的证据进行主题归类与整合,并采用JBI证据预分级系统(2014版)进行证据等级分级。 结果 共纳入11篇文献,整合形成29条最佳证据。本总结首次构建了涵盖评估、处方、干预、随访与教育的全方位管理框架;核心是提出了适用于我国医疗资源现状的“分层协同”实施路径,证据特别凸显了跨团队协作、本土化工具开发及护士在延续性照护中的核心协调作用。 结论 本研究汇总的证据可结合不同医疗机构特点、临床场景及患者个体差异选择应用,为老年CHF患者多重用药管理提供了全面、循证的实践依据。   

关键词: 老年人, 心力衰竭, 循证护理学, 多重用药, 用药管理, 证据总结

Abstract: Objective To summarize the best evidence for polypharmacy management in elderly patients with chronic heart failure(CHF), and to provide a basis for healthcare professionals to assess polypharmacy in this population and standardize medication management practices. Methods Following the 6S model, evidences on polypharmacy management were retrieved from databases including UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, JBI Evidence-Based Practice Database, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines website, Medlive, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. The search timeframe spanned from the inception of each database to March 2025. The PIPOST model was adopted to clarify evidence-based questions, and the included literature types comprised clinical guidelines, evidence summaries, systematic reviews, expert consensus statements, and clinical decision-making documents. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, quality assessment, and evidence extraction, with any discrepancies resolved through consultation with a third researcher. Finally, the extracteds evidences were thematically categorized and synthesized, and the JBI Evidence Pre-grading System (2014 version) was applied to grade the levels of evidences. Results A total of 11 articles were included, from which 29 best-practice recommendations were synthesized. The innovation of this summary lies in the development of a comprehensive management framework encompassing assessment, prescribing, intervention, follow-up, and education of the patients. Central to this framework is the proposal of a “tiered collaborative” implementation pathway tailored to China’s current healthcare resource landscape. The evidence particularly highlights the value of interprofessional collaboration, the development of locally adapted assessment tools, and the pivotal coordinating role of nurses in continuity of care. Conclusions The evidence synthesized in this study can be applied in clinical practice by selecting the most appropriate evidence in combination with hospital context, clinical scenarios, and individual patient characteristics. This approach aims to standardize polypharmacy management practices and ensure medication safety.   

Key words: aged, heart failure, evidence-based nursing, polypharmacy, medication management, evidence summary

中图分类号: